I-0414: Method Of Audit Prevention May Be Site-Configurable



  This transaction consists of a proposal for a National Interpretation of
  a Common Criteria document. It is being posted in accordance with the
  procedures of the IWG.

  Comments on this proposal are welcomed and should be posted to this
  transaction chain.  If any party wishes to post a comment anonymously,
  the comment should be mailed to IWG@gibraltar.ncsc.mil in a form
  suitable for posting.  All comments should be posted no later than
  Tuesday, May 29, 2001.


                 CCITSE/CEM  NIAP INTERPRETATION (PROPOSED)


     _________________________________________________________________

          I-0414: Method Of Audit Prevention May Be Site-Configurable
     _________________________________________________________________

TYPE:                 NIAP Interpretation
NUMBER:               I-0414
STATUS:               Ready for External Review

TITLE:                Method Of Audit Prevention May Be Site-Configurable
WOULD SUPERSEDE:
     I-0348           Audit Data Loss Prevention Method May Be Site-Selectable

SOURCE REFERENCE:     CC v2.1 Part 2 Subclause 3.6 FAU_STG
                      CC v2.1 Part 2 Subclause C.6 FAU_STG
RELATED TO:
     I-0348           Audit Data Loss Prevention Method May Be Site-Selectable

ISSUE:

   The FAU_STG family does not support a way for the administrator to
   specify that the actions taken by the TSF to prevent audit data loss
   when the audit trail is full can be site-selectable. Instead, the
   FAU_STG.4.1 element explicitly states the actions to be taken by the
   TSF when the audit log is full. This wording implicitly prevents a
   site from selecting the actions taken to prevent loss of audit data.

STATEMENT

   It is acceptable for the TSF to allow the method taken by the TSF to
   prevent audit loss when the audit trail is full to be site-selectable,
   as long as the TSF provides a pre-determined set of allowable actions
   and one of these actions is defined as a default.

SPECIFIC INTERPRETATION:

   To address this interpretation, the following changes are made to CC
   v2.1: (additions marked _thusly_; deletions marked _[DEL:_ thusly
   _:DEL]_ )


     * In Clause 3, Figure 3.1, the component levelling diagram for
       FAU_STG is modified to show a new component, NIAP-0414, that is
       hierarchically above component 4.

     * In Subclause 3.6, the component levelling diagram is modified to
       show a new component, NIAP-0414, that is hierarchically above
       component 4.

     * In Subclause 3.6, the following paragraph is added after paragraph
       129:

       FAU_STG.NIAP-0414 Site-Configurable Prevention of Audit Loss
       permits the site to determine the action to be taken when the
       audit trail is full.

     * In Subclause 3.6, the following is added after paragraph 133:

       _Management: FAU_STG.NIAP-0414_

       The following actions could be considered for the management
       functions in FMT:

         1. Maintenance (deletion, modification, addition) of actions to
            be taken in case of audit storage failure.

     * In Subclause 3.6, the following is added after paragraph 136:
       _Audit:_ FAU_STG.NIAP-0414

       The following actions should be auditable if FAU_GEN Security
       audit data generation is included in the PP/ST:

         1. Basic: Actions taken due to the audit storage failure.

         2. Basic: Selection of an action to be taken when there is an
            audit storage failure.

     * The following component is added to Subclause 3.6, FAU_STG, after
       FAU_STG.4:

       _FAU_STG.NIAP-0414 Site-Configurable Prevention of Audit Loss_

       _Hierarchical to:_ FAU_STG.4

       _FAU_STG.NIAP-0414-1._ The TSF shall provide the administrator the
       capability to select one or more of the following actions
       [selection: _'ignore auditable events', 'prevent auditable events,
       except those taken by the authorised user with special rights',
       'overwrite the oldest stored audit records'_] and [assignment:
       _other actions to be taken in case of audit storage failure_] to
       be taken if the audit trail is full.

       _FAU_STG.NIAP-0414-2._ The TSF shall [selection: _'ignore
       auditable events', 'prevent auditable events, except those taken
       by the authorised user with special rights', 'overwrite the oldest
       stored audit records'_] and [assignment: _other actions to be
       taken in case of audit storage failure_] if the audit trail is
       full and no other action has been selected.

       _Dependencies:_

          + FAU_STG.1 Protected Audit Trail Storage
          + FMT_MTD.1 Management of TSF Data

     * In Clause C, Figure C.1, the component levelling diagram for
       FAU_STG is modified to show a new component, NIAP-0414, that is
       hierarchically above component 4.

     * In Subclause C.6, FAU_STG, the following is added after paragraph
       640:

       _FAU_STG.NIAP-0414 Site-Configurable Prevention of Audit Loss_

       _User Application Notes:_

       This component specifies the set of administrator selectable
       actions that the TSF must be capable of performing when the audit
       trail is full and allows the administrator to specify which action
       is to be performed by the TSF. It also provides a default action
       to take if the administrator does not select one of the actions.

       _Operations_

       _Selection:_

       In FAU_STG.NIAP-0414-1, the PP/ST author should select one or more
       of the following actions that the TSF must have the ability to
       perform: (1) ignore auditable actions, (2) prevent the occurrence
       of auditable actions, and (3) overwrite the oldest audit records.

       In FAU_STG.NIAP-0414-2, the PP/ST author should select one of the
       actions as the default action to be performed by the administrator
       in the event that no action is selected by the administrator.

       _Assignment:_

       In FAU_STG.NIAP-0414-1, the PP/ST author should specify other
       actions that should be taken in case of audit storage failure,
       such as informing an authorized user.

       In FAU_STG.NIAP-0414-2, the PP/ST author should specify other
       actions that should be taken in case of audit storage failure when
       no action has been selected, such as informing the authorized
       user.

PROJECTED IMPACT:

   Negligible impact anticipated.

SUPPORT:

   A new component is required that allows a site to select the action(s)
   to be performed by the TSF when the audit trail is full. This ability
   increases the flexibility of the TOE and allows the TOE to adjust to
   changing security needs.

   This new component also specifies the default action(s) to be taken if
   no action is selected by the administrator.

   Note 1: The management section for FAU_STG.4 implies that
   site-selectable actions are permitted. This statement is inconsistent
   with FAU_STG.4.1, which requires the PP/ST author to explicitly select
   and assign the actions to be taken when the audit trail is full.

   Note 2: FAU_STG.4 refers to "the authorised user with special rights".
   This phrase is not defined and is not used elsewhere in the Common
   Criteria. In addition, this interpretation describes the
   "administrator" as the one selecting the action performed by the TSF
   when the audit trail is full, and "the authorized user with special
   rights" is notified when the audit trail fills up. Although it
   introduces an internal inconsistency in the interpretation, the phrase
   was used to be consistent with the wording of FAU_STG.4.


0414-np.pdf



Date Index | Thread Index | Problems or questions? Contact list-master@nist.gov