Re: CC request for interpretation: testing while in normal mode?

["Daniel P. Faigin" <faigin@solarium.aero.org>]

On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:05:40 -0800, James Arnold <James.L.Arnold.Jr@saic.com>
said: 

> In my experience, the CCEVS
> (or rather some of its representatives) has demonstrated some bias when
> considering validation issues related to PPs that they have developed, for
> example.

Well, irrespective of the past (since I don't know what you are referring to),
it is my understanding that the validation portion of CCEVS is not involved
with the actual development of profiles anymore.

> Perhaps I should not have used the word "academic." However, this chain
> started out with, in my opinion, an outrageous claim about the definition of
> TSF and I don't believe it would be appropriate to seriously consider that
> claim.

I wouldn't say "outragious claim", I'd say "sloppy wording". But then again,
you say Tomatoe, and I say...


Daniel