RE: CC request for interpretation: testing while in normal mode?
- Subject: RE: CC request for interpretation: testing while in normal mode?
- From: "Knoke, Jim" <Jim.Knoke@GetronicsGov.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:29:57 -0400
- content-class: urn:content-classes:message
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- Thread-Index: AcGwwk20HolYwkyKQTmnBeRGwB/yZxojvWXA
- Thread-Topic: CC request for interpretation: testing while in normal mode?
If the tests themselves are part of the TSF, and the TSF also includes
the normal mode operating system, but the tests run only in a
maintenance mode, does the operating system on top of which the tests
run also have to be part of the TSF?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Arnold [mailto:James.L.Arnold.Jr@saic.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:57 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Re: CC request for interpretation: testing while in
> normal mode?
>
>
>
> I'm a little concerned about the NIB statement: "...the TSF
> includes everything that contributes to security...". This is
> simply not true. In general, the TSF includes the functions
> related to the security functional requirements, but does not
> include things related to the assurance requirements, for example.
>
> Despite the poor wording, I agree that abstract machine and
> TSF tests are part of the TSF. As noted in an earlier
> response, the TOE can have multiple modes of operation and
> such tests could be exercised in a mode other than what might
> be considered normal. Regardless, such tests are part of the
> TSF since they serve to implement security functional
> requirements. Note that such tests and their associated
> execution environments would necessarily be subject to the
> same assurance requirements as the rest of the TSF. However,
> I have to wonder about how such tests might be tested...
>
>
> Original question:
>
> "The abstract machine testing (FPT_AMT.1) and TSF testing
> (FPT_TST.1) requirements state the "the TSF shall run" a
> suite of tests. This sounds like the tests have to be
> runnable on the TOE itself, *while* the TOE is in a *normal*
> operational state. But then the "evaluator application notes"
> in sections J.1 and J.16 state that the tests can be run
> while in an off-line or maintenance mode. Are all these
> statements consistent?
>
> As a product developer I'd be happy to have the flexibility
> to only provide the tests in off-line or maintenance mode. In
> those modes, does some form of TSF have to be running or can
> a non-evaluated "operating system" be specified for running
> the tests?"
>
> NIAP Interpretations Board wrote:
>
> > "...
> >
> > The current wording might not be straightforward, but it isn't
> > inconsistent. Given that the TSF includes everything that
> contributes
> > to security, the off-line tests would also be included in the TSF."
>
>
>
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Problems or questions? Contact list-master@nist.gov