RI: "parts" of the TOE
- Subject: RI: "parts" of the TOE
- From: "Knoke, Jim" <Jim.Knoke@GetronicsGov.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 07:08:51 -0400
- content-class: urn:content-classes:message
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
- Thread-Index: AcIdy2BGEZUxH4mZEdapc3CXZsEAAA==
- Thread-Topic: RI: "parts" of the TOE
FPT_ITT and FPT_TRC involve "parts" of the TOE. Paragraph 1210 of CC
part 2 implies that almost any subcomponent of the TOE could be
considered a separate "part". How does one determine the granularity of
"parts" in the TOE? Does the PP or ST have to discuss the threats and
environment in such a way that the granularity is obvious? If the
environment is very hostile, couldn't the TOE rely on physical
protections to protect transfers between "closely bound" subcomponents
(e.g., transfers over a system bus)?
In my product, the most likely candidates for separate parts would be
serial terminals and parallel printers. I would like to claim that these
components reside in the same facility as the main system cabinet and
that some combination of physical, personnel, and procedural controls
provide the protection of transfers to and from those components. I
would not like to incur the expense of adding cryptography to every such
transfer.
Jim Knoke
Getronics Government Solutions, LLC
2525 Network Place MS-350
Herndon, VA 20171
(703) 563-8086
Jim.Knoke@GetronicsGov.com
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Problems or questions? Contact list-master@nist.gov