Re: CC request for interpretation: TSF required during maintenance mode?
- Subject: Re: CC request for interpretation: TSF required during maintenance mode?
- From: "NIAP Interpretations Board" <ccevs-nib@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:26:30 -0700
- Content-description: Mail message body
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- Priority: normal
- Reply-to: cc-cmt@nist.gov
There must be a distinction between "operational" and "maintenance" modes
because the CC uses distinct terms. There can be multiple operational
modes and multiple maintenance modes. In general, the NIB feels that a
particular mode is a "maintenance" mode if one or more of the SFPs is
"offline", i.e., not enforced. This could be the state while the characteristics of
a policy are being modified such that suspension of enforcement is
necessary, or it could be a state where the policy may be inconsistent
(internally or with some other policy) and must be amended before its
enforcement can resume. The ST author may define a mode as
"maintenance" or "operational", and the evaluator may accept or challenge
the definition.
A secure state is one in which the SFPs cannot be violated. This occurs
when all SFPs are operational and being enforced; it also occurs when
unauthorized users are denied access to the system while the enforcement
of one or more policies is suspended. As with modes, the ST author may
define a state as secure, and the evaluator may accept or challenge the
definition.
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Problems or questions? Contact list-master@nist.gov