CC conformance claim
- Subject: CC conformance claim
- From: "YOKOTA HIROFUMI" <yokota-hirofumi@jqa.jp>
- Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 23:10:30 +0900
- Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001C_01C2ADFD.270AB720"
*** I am resending this after the Japanese signature removed. ****
*** I'm very sorry for the nuisance. ****
For the ST evaluation, CEM work unit ASE_INT.1-3 [333] says:
The evaluator determines that the CC conformance claim is
in accordance with section 5.4 of CC Part 1.
CC Part 1 section 5.4 shows terms for the claim as the following.
Part 2 conformant
Part 2 extended
Part 3 conformant
(others ... )
Question:
Does the ST require to describe the CC conformance claim using
exactly the same terms that are shown in the section 5.4 of CC Part 1 ?
I mean:
is the following claim acceptable at the ST evaluation ?
ISO/IEC 15408 Part 2 (CC V2.1 Part2) conformant
As we could see above, additional words are placed there.
Regards,
Yokota
smime.p7s
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Problems or questions? Contact list-master@nist.gov