RE: CC conformance claim

["Foreman, Elizabeth A." <foreman@mitretek.org>]

Yokota:

 

Please advise where you found CCIMB Interpretation 210.  On the Commoncriteria.org website, 210 is still a Request for Interpretation and it's concerned with "security and 'confidentiality'" and ADO.

 

Beth

 

-----Original Message-----
From: YOKOTA HIROFUMI [mailto:yokota-hirofumi@jqa.jp] 
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 2:54 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: CC conformance claim

 

Thanks Gary,

 

And Happy New Year!

 

But, I am looking at the ST and see the following further,

which both CC and CCIMB Interpretations-0210 do not define and request.

 

"CCIMB Interpretations-0210 conformant"

 

Could we still accept such claim as valid 'CC conformance claim'? 

 

Regards,

   Yokota

	----- Original Message ----- 

	From: Gary Stoneburner <mailto:gary.stoneburner@nist.gov>  

	To: Multiple recipients of list <mailto:cc-cmt@nist.gov>  

	Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:22 PM

	Subject: Re: CC conformance claim

	 

	That should be acceptable.
	
	Cheers,
	Gary
	
	At 05:17 AM 12/27/2002, YOKOTA HIROFUMI wrote:
	
	

	I mean:
	is the following claim acceptable at the ST evaluation ?
	
	ISO/IEC 15408 Part 2 (CC V2.1 Part2) conformant
	
	As we could see, additional words are there, but they are not wrong.
	
	Regards,
	   Yokota

	**************************************************************************
	* Opinions expressed are not intended to reflect an official position
	**************************************************************************
	* Gary Stoneburner
	* Computer Security Division, National Institute of Standards & Technology
	* 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8930, Gaithersburg, MD 20877-8930          
	* Phone: 301-975-5394, FAX: 301-948-0279, Email: Stoneburner@nist.gov 
	**************************************************************************