Re: Expertise, Resources, and Motivation of Attackers
- Subject: Re: Expertise, Resources, and Motivation of Attackers
- From: "NIAP Interpretations Board" <ccevs-nib@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:48:34 -0800
- Content-description: Mail message body
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- Priority: normal
- Reply-to: cc-cmt@nist.gov
The NIB would like to add that, for CCEVS evaluations of an ST that contains no
permutational nor probabilistic mechanisms, an SOF claim is not applicable.
This guidance is captured in CCEVS precedence decision PD-0086 (located at:
http://niap.nist.gov/cc-scheme/PD/0086.html). Also, as indicated in PD-0048
(http://niap.nist.gov/cc-scheme/PD/0048.html) a PP author generally cannot
determine that a compliant ST will not contain permutational nor probabilistic
mechanisms. Therefore an SOF claim is generally required for PPs.
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Problems or questions? Contact list-master@nist.gov