Re: Interrelationship between PPs and Interps

["YOKOTA HIROFUMI" <yokota-hirofumi@jqa.jp>]

Is this related to the guidance in the precedent database?

http://niap.nist.gov/cc-scheme/PD/by_number.html

PD-0074 Dealing with Errors in a PP
PD-0078 Incorporation of interpretations into a PP
PD-0079 Handling of Interpretations

   Yokota

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michelle A. Ruppel" <maruppel@saffiresys.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <cc-cmt@nist.gov>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:50 AM
Subject: RE: Interrelationship between PPs and Interps


>
> My interpretation is that the ST should be written as if the PP was
> automatically updated as a result of new International Interps and
> the PP conformance section of the ST should include rationale to explain
> these differences.
>
> Michelle A. Ruppel
> Saffire Systems
> P.O. Box 11154
> Champaign, IL  61826
> 217-359-7763   Fax:  217-359-8753
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cc-cmt@nist.gov [mailto:cc-cmt@nist.gov] On Behalf Of Tom Benkart
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 10:58 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Interrelationship between PPs and Interps
>
>
>
> The PPs address all Interps through the time of their kick-off
> meetings.  However, by the time STs are written claiming conformance to
> them, there may be new Interps that effectively change some of the
contents
> of the PPs.
>
> How should STs deal with those instances?  Should the PPs be considered
> "automatically updated" as a result of the new Interps?  Does rationale
> need to be included in the PP conformance section of the ST?
>
> Tom
>
> Tom Benkart
> Lab Manager
> COACT, Inc.
> 9140 Guilford Road, Suite G
> Columbia, MD. 21046
> 301-498-0150
> Fax: 301-498-0855
> teb@coact.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>