Re: Final Interpretation for RI 137 - Rules governing binding should be specifiable

[Gary Stoneburner <gary.stoneburner@nist.gov>]

CCEVS is its own entity.  Each of the schemes that comprise the CC
Project are operating entities in their own right, caring out their
individual missions.  The very fact that we can use this email list
to discuss issues is an example of CCEVS operations.

So do not let any current CC Project shortfalls imply any shortfall in
the operation of CCEVS or any of the other schemes.

Cheers,
Gary

At 11:54 PM 2/24/2004, YOKOTA HIROFUMI wrote:

Surely, it is not less much in regard to CCEVS.
I am very glad to find two RIs handled in the interpretations, which I submitted previously.
CC-cmt has notified me of this.

----- Original Message -----

From: Gary Stoneburner

To: Multiple recipients of list

Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 12:26 AM

Subject: RE: Final Interpretation for RI 137 - Rules governing binding should be specifiable

This thread makes one wonder how much "project" is actually in the CC Project. :-)

Gary

**************************************************************************
* Opinions expressed are not intended to reflect an official position
**************************************************************************
* Gary Stoneburner
* Computer Security Division, National Institute of Standards & Technology
* 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8930, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8930         
* Phone: 301-975-5394, FAX: 301-948-0279, Email: Stoneburner@nist.gov
* http://csrc.nist.gov/staff/stoneburner/gshome.html
**************************************************************************