Re: RI # 192 - Sequencing of sub-activities



The NIB agrees with the intent of this interpretation, but disagrees with the 
solution provided. Specifically, the NIB could not see how the suggested 
criteria changes addressed the issue. The changes presented appear to just 
combine paragraphs 1803 and 1804 into a single paragraph. This could just have 
been a cut-and-paste error, as the original RI appears to have a reasonable 
suggested resolution.







Date Index | Thread Index | Problems or questions? Contact list-master@nist.gov