Re: SFRs - Requirement Specification or Implementation Description?

Subject: Re: SFRs - Requirement Specification or Implementation Description?
From: "YOKOTA HIROFUMI" <yokota-hirofumi@jqa.jp>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:13:46 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
References: <BD3748772E02FB4596FFF09D2CCA06DB019D3745@s228130hz1ew08.apptix-01.savvis.net> <200612011139.09686.out@itsef.com>


I think, there are variations. Sometimes, the TOE's startup/shutdown might
be the audit function's startup/shutdown, or enabling/disabling some
security modules could be the audit functions startup/shutdown. Or, for some
auditable events, disc failures, communication failures and those recoveries
might be the audit startup/shutdown functions.

In any above cases we would need to audit the "time", when the auditing is
enabled and/or disabled.

Regards,
Hirofumi Yokota

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SFRs - Requirement Specification or Implementation Description?
  - From: "YOKOTA HIROFUMI" <yokota-hirofumi@jqa.jp>

References:
- RE: SFRs - Requirement Specification or Implementation Description?
  - From: "Squires, Alicia" <Alicia.Squires@savvis.net>
- Re: SFRs - Requirement Specification or Implementation Description?
  - From: "Dirk-Jan Out" <out@itsef.com>

Prev by Date: Re: SFRs - Requirement Specification or Implementation Description?
Next by Date: Re: SFRs - Requirement Specification or Implementation Description?
Prev by thread: Re: SFRs - Requirement Specification or Implementation Description?
Next by thread: Re: SFRs - Requirement Specification or Implementation Description?

Date Index | Thread Index | Problems or questions? Contact list-master@nist.gov