cc-cmt@nist.gov Mail Index (by Thread)
Last updated: Tue Apr 22 10:47:40 2008
1735 messages sorted by thread
- PD 0142: Meeting FTA_TAH_EXP.1 in the DBMS PP,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Re: Clarification/Correction on CC v3.1 ADV_TDS.3,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- CC v4 ideas and suggestions,
Nir Naaman
- PD 0140: Clarification on conformance to consistency issues noted in the U.S. Government Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) Cli,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Re: PD 0135: "Overwriting" in the Context of Non-Disk Memory (Medium Robustness Profiles),
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0141: OD 0265: Clarification on conformance to consistency issues noted in the U.S. Government Wireless Local Area Network (,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0138: Sharing of Peripherals with Memory under the Peripheral Sharing PP,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0136: Using CCv2.x PPs with CCv3.1 STs: Handling of FPT_SEP and FPT_RVM,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Re: FDP_ITT.4 Attribute-based integrity monitoring,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- PD 0139: CC V3 Conformance Type for Existing CC V2 PPs,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0137: CC V3 PP Conformance Type Consistency,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Updated PD 0097: Compliance with IDS System PP Export Requirements,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Re: Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0135: "Overwriting" in the Context of Flash Memory (Medium Robustness,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0134: Medium Robustness Traffic Filtering PP: Administrator accounts,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0133: Level of Detail in SFRs,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Re: Type Correction (PD-0112),
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0131: Create Object Audit Event and CAPP Compliance,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- RE: PD 0131: Create Object Audit Event and CAPP Compliance,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- Re: PD 0131: Create Object Audit Event and CAPP Compliance,
Helmut Kurth
- RE: PD 0131: Create Object Audit Event and CAPP Compliance,
Nir Naaman
- Re: PD 0131: Create Object Audit Event and CAPP Compliance,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- Re: PD 0131: Create Object Audit Event and CAPP Compliance,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- RE: PD 0131: Create Object Audit Event and CAPP Compliance,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- RE: PD 0131: Create Object Audit Event and CAPP Compliance,
Boberski, Michael A.
- RE: PD 0131: Create Object Audit Event and CAPP Compliance,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- Re: PD 0131: Create Object Audit Event and CAPP Compliance,
Olin Sibert
- Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- Re: Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Hal W Forsberg
- RE: Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Michelle Ruppel
- RE: Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Dawn Adams
- RE: Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Daniel P. Faigin
- RE: Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- RE: Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Hal W Forsberg
- RE: Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Daniel P. Faigin
- Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Daniel P. Faigin
- RE: Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- RE: Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Daniel P. Faigin
- RE: Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Williamson, Robert L. Jr.
- RE: Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Daniel P. Faigin
- RE: Addendum to Policy Letter 13: Audit Generation Functionality,
Michelle Ruppel
- Re: PD 0131: Create Object Audit Event and CAPP Compliance,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0132: Terminating Sessions in lieu of Locking Sessions,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Re: PD 0130:Clarification of Alert requirement in Basic Robustness,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- RE: SFRs - Requirement Specification or Implementation Descripti on?,
Kris Rogers
- SFRs - Requirement Specification or Implementation Description?,
Apted, Tony J. [RA]
- Re: Acceptance plan needed for configuration items that don't go into the TOE,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0130:Clarification of Alert requirement in Basic Robustness Anti-Virus PP,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0128: Information in Test Results for Manual Tests,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0129: Deletion of the oldest audit events when audit storage space is exhausted,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- RE: wordings are not consistent in CCV3.1,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- CCEVS Announcement Impact,
Kathy Shonaiya
- The meaning of "not otherwise described",
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- Update on CCv3,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0127: Compliance with IDS Analyzer PP Export Requirements,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Re: Installation, generation and start-up vs. implementation/PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Re: TSS Level of Detail/PD 0063: What Information Must Be Provided in the TSS,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- RE: TSS Level of Detail/PD 0063: What Information Must Be Provided in the TSS,
Alex Ragen
- RE: TSS Level of Detail/PD 0063: What Information Must Be Provided in the TSS,
Daniel P. Faigin
- Re: TSS Level of Detail/PD 0063: What Information Must Be Provided in the TSS,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- wordings are not consistent in CCV3.1,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- Re: wordings are not consistent in CCV3.1,
Dirk-Jan Out
- Re: wordings are not consistent in CCV3.1,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- RE: wordings are not consistent in CCV3.1,
John Boone
- Re: wordings are not consistent in CCV3.1,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- RE: wordings are not consistent in CCV3.1,
John Boone
- FDP_ITT.4 Attribute-based integrity monitoring,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- Re: FDP_ITT.4 Attribute-based integrity monitoring,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- RE: TSS Level of Detail/PD 0063: What Information Must Be Provided in the TSS,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- Re: TSS Level of Detail/PD 0063: What Information Must Be Provided in the TSS,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- HLD and IT Environment SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- A.NO_EVIL for TOE with limited privileges,
Michelle Ruppel
- Browser in the TOE for web-based administration?,
Michelle Ruppel
- RE: Browser in the TOE for web-based administration?,
Boberski, Michael A.
- RE: Browser in the TOE for web-based administration?,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- RE: Browser in the TOE for web-based administration?,
Boberski, Michael A.
- RE: Browser in the TOE for web-based administration?,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- RE: Browser in the TOE for web-based administration?,
Boberski, Michael A.
- Re: Browser in the TOE for web-based administration?,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Interfaces in the Logical Boundary,
Michelle Ruppel
- Fw: [CORRECTION] Critical Infrastructure Protection ma,
Bob Radvanovsky
- ACM_SCP V2.2 vs ALC_CMS V3.0,
Alexandre le Goaster
- FDP_UCT description wrong in CC Part 2 Section 6.12,
Michelle Ruppel
- Typo in CC Part 2 v2.3 with FPT_TST.1.1,
Tom Benkart
- [ANNOUNCEMENT] Mailing list relating to CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION,
Bob Radvanovsky
- Classification in CC V3.0,
Alexandre le Goaster
- V2.2 --> V3.0... i'm lost...,
Alexandre le Goaster
- FMT in CC V3.0,
Michelle Ruppel
- Resaonableness (was part of RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs),
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Trey Henefield
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Boberski, Michael A.
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Williamson, Robert L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0126: Administrator-entered Code Used To Meet SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- PD 0063: What Information Must Be Provided in the TSS,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- RE: PD 0063: What Information Must Be Provided in the TSS,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0063: What Information Must Be Provided in the TSS,
Boberski, Michael A.
- RE: PD 0063: What Information Must Be Provided in the TSS,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0063: What Information Must Be Provided in the TSS,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0063: What Information Must Be Provided in the TSS,
Apted, Tony J. [RA]
- TSS Level of Detail,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- Installation, generation and start-up vs. implementation,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- Installation, generation and start-up vs. implementation,
Daniel P. Faigin
- RE: Installation, generation and start-up vs. implementation,
Trey Henefield
- RE: Installation, generation and start-up vs. implementation,
Nir Naaman
- RE: Installation, generation and start-up vs. implementation,
Williamson, Robert L. Jr.
- RE: Installation, generation and start-up vs. implementation,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Installation, generation and start-up vs. implementation,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- FDP_ITC and signature decryption,
Richard Relph
- semiformal vs informal,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- Updated PD 0124: Depth of Protocol or Interface Examination,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Re: PD 0113: Use of Third-party Security Mechanisms in TOE,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD -0125: Audit Pre-Selection in the CIMC PP,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Sad News,
Daniel P. Faigin
- Re: CCv3.0 STs claiming conformance to CCv2.2 PPs,
Greg Bremen
- CC v3.0 draft - ADV_ARC.1,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- PD 0120: Parameter Validation Testing,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0123: Defining Protocols as Internal or External Interfaces,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0122: Description of Logical and Physical Boundaries,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- RE: PD 0122: Description of Logical and Physical Boundaries,
Trey Henefield
- RE: PD 0122: Description of Logical and Physical Boundaries,
Michelle Ruppel
- FW: PD 0122: Description of Logical and Physical Boundaries,
Michelle Ruppel
- RE: PD 0122: Description of Logical and Physical Boundaries,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0122: Description of Logical and Physical Boundaries,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD 0122: Description of Logical and Physical Boundaries,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- PD 0122: Description of Logical and Physical Boundaries,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- RE: PD 0122: Description of Logical and Physical Boundaries,
Williamson, Robert L. Jr.
- Re: PD 0122: Description of Logical and Physical Boundaries,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0124: Depth of Protocol or Interface Examination,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0113 updated,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0121: Format of the ADV_IMP Implementation Representation,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 117 Revised,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0119: Applicability of FIA_UAU.7 Application Note in CAPP v1.d,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- RE: TOE unique identifiers for hardware,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- New CCIMB Interpretations,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- PD 118: Assumptions in the IDS PP v1.4,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0117: PP conformance Using an Underlying Evaluated Product,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Sorry again - complete response,
Hal W Forsberg
- RE: CC 3.0 draft?,
Pamela.Grannum
- ST Opinions/Requirements,
Michelle Ruppel
- RE: FIA_UID interpretations,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- How to pronounce ISO15408,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- What is the meaning of "not specified" in FAU_GEN.1.1 (b)?,
Tom Benkart
- PD 0116: IDSSPP v1.4: Compliance with the Selective Audit Requirement,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- I-0482: Properties Of Default Values For Attributes,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- I-0471: Objects In The TOE,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Updated PD 0103: Clarify CCEVS Policy for Applying NIAP Interpretations,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0115: Third Party Authentication is permitted by the ALFWPP-MR,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0114: Meeting the ADO_DEL.3 Requirement,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0113: Use of Third-party Security Mechanisms in TOE Evaluations,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0112: Can a non-hardware TOE claim conformance with FPT_SEP.1?,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0111: Clarify the Definitive Source of International Interps,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Re: Conditional SFRs within an ST,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Re: IDS System Components,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- NIB Postings: Third Times The Charm!,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE (does mutual recognition work?),
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE (does mutual recognition work?),
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE (does mutual recognition work?),
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE (does mutual recognition work?),
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE (does mutual recognition work?),
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE (does mutual recognition work?),
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE (does mutual recognition work?),
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE (does mutual recognition work?),
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- RE: Assets definition,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- Re: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Jim Fink
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Hal W Forsberg
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Jim Fink
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Hal W Forsberg
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Hal W Forsberg
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Hal W Forsberg
- Re: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- Re: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Greg Bremen
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- Re: FPT_SEP in an Application TOE,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Conditional SFRs within an ST ...,
Trey Henefield
- IDS System Components ...,
Trey Henefield
- Application TOE SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Compton, Tammy S.
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Hal W Forsberg
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Hal W Forsberg
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Hal W Forsberg
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Hal W Forsberg
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Hal W Forsberg
- RE: Application TOE SFRs,
Hal W Forsberg
- Re: Application TOE SFRs,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- demise of AMA?,
Knoke, Jim
- Re: FDP_ITC.1.2 and the phrase 'security attibutes associated with the user data',
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- I-0480: Components Written As Environmental Actions,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- I-0479: FTP_ITC.1.3 Specifies The Functions Needing A Trusted Channel,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Re: FMT_MSA.3: Restrictive/ Permissive Default Values,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Re: Draft interpretation RI#220 (FCS CKM/COP depending on FDP_ITC.1),
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Withdrawal of CC Certificates,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- PD 0109: Multiple Hardware Models with Different SFRs in One Security Target,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0110: Actions/Information Required of the Developer and Evaluator When Performing ADV_RCR Work,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Fwd: Re: no bolding in CC v2.2 Part 3,
Gary Stoneburner
- CEM ACM_CAP.[2-4]-1 Clarification,
Michelle A. Ruppel
- Archive of CCIMB interpretations,
Paul Bicknell
- Interpretations Web Page,
Michelle A. Ruppel
- PD 0108: FTP_ITC.1.3 Specifies The Functions For Which A Trusted Channel Is Provided,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD 0107: IDSSPP v1.4: FPT_STM.1 Must Be Met by the TOE,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Clarification of rules when incorporating NIAP interps,
Tom Benkart
- Clarification of rules when incorporating NIAP interps,
Daniel P. Faigin
- RE: Clarification of rules when incorporating NIAP interps,
Creech, Justin
- RE: Clarification of rules when incorporating NIAP interps,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- Re: Clarification of rules when incorporating NIAP interps,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- RE: Clarification of rules when incorporating NIAP interps,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- Re: Clarification of rules when incorporating NIAP interps,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- RE: Clarification of rules when incorporating NIAP interps,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Clarification of rules when incorporating NIAP interps,
Carpenter, Diann
- RE: Clarification of rules when incorporating NIAP interps,
Stoneburner, Gary R.
- Re: Clarification of rules when incorporating NIAP interps,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- RE: The term "argued away",
Apted, Tony J. [RA]
- Re: How to express the TSP in SFRs for a simple encryption box,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- FMT_MSA.3: Restrictive/Permissive Default Values,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FMT_MSA.3: Restrictive/Permissive Default Values,
Nir Naaman
- Re: FMT_MSA.3: Restrictive/Permissive Default Values,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- RE: FMT_MSA.3: Restrictive/Permissive Default Values,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FMT_MSA.3: Restrictive/Permissive Default Values,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FMT_MSA.3: Restrictive/Permissive Default Values,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FMT_MSA.3: Restrictive/Permissive Default Values,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FMT_MSA.3: Restrictive/Permissive Default Values,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: FMT_MSA.3: Restrictive/Permissive Default Values,
Bottomly, Ronald J.
- RE: FMT_MSA.3: Restrictive/Permissive Default Values,
Apted, Tony J. [RA]
- Re: Draft Interpretation for RI 178 - FAU confuses "audited" and "auditable",
NIAP Interpretations Board
- I-0468: Must Test Setup And Cleanup Code Run Unprivileged?,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Re: Information Flow,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- I-0469: What Does "Initial Startup" Mean For FPT_AMT And FPT_TST?,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Re: PD-0097: Compliance with IDS System PP Export Requirements,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Re: Questions about if Common Criteria is used in certain areas,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- PD-0105: Acceptability of IKE Authentication as "Single Use" In Firewall PPs,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD-0106: Situations Where AGD_USR May Be Vacuously Satisfied,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD-0104: Testing All Claimed Platforms,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- I-0477: Management Of Subject Attributes,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- FDP Policies and Subject-to-subject Transfers,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Interpretation of FAU_SEL.1.1 and FAU_STG.4.1,
montse
- cc-cmt question about IT Environment SFRs in PPs and STs,
Tom Benkart
- RE: Categorisation of SFRs for the TOE and for the IT environment (flawed PPs),
Pamela.Grannum
- Categorisation of SFRs for the TOE and for the IT environment,
Agievich Sergei V.
- New ETR Format (LabGram#027),
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- commoncriteriaportal.org,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- The International CC Web Page,
Krall Ed-P27726
- Evaluation of deployed IT systems? composition and risk management,
Magosányi Árpád
- Re: Statement of FMT_MSA.3.2,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Re: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_STM?,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Re: RI # 178 - FAU confuses "audited" and "auditable",
NIAP Interpretations Board
- PD-0102: CIMC PP Compliance for Iterated Requirements that are Satisfied by the IT Environment,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Magosányi Árpád
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Daniel P. Faigin
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Daniel P. Faigin
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Daniel P. Faigin
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Magosányi Árpád
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Magosányi Árpád
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Magosányi Árpád
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Magosányi Árpád
- RE: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Nir Naaman
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Daniel P. Faigin
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Magosányi Árpád
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Daniel P. Faigin
- RE: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Nir Naaman
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Magosányi Árpád
- Re: PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD-0101: Level of Detail Necessary for Assurance Requirements on Third Party Products,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD-0100: When can evaluation evidence be reused?,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- PD-0103: Clarify CCEVS Policy for Applying NIAP Interpretations,
Observation Decisions Review Board
- Re: RI # 177 - Meaning of "least upper bound" and "greatest lower bound",
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Re: RI # 180 - COV.3 dependency on FSP.1,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Re: RI # 220 - FCS_CKM/COP dependency on FDP_ITC.1,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Re: RI # 192 - Sequencing of sub-activities,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Email account utilization warning.,
noreply
- Minor RI Issues (#3, #4, & #38),
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- [Fwd: Announcement of Common Criteria Discussion List],
David Ochel
- Replacement site for commoncriteria.org,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- FCS_COP and FCS_CKM interdependency,
Magosányi Árpád
- RI#103 and #104,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Final Interpretation for RI 137 - Rules governing binding sho uld be specifiable,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Final Interpretation for RI 137 - Rules governing binding sho uld be specifiable,
Daniel P. Faigin
- RE: Final Interpretation for RI 137 - Rules governing binding sho uld be specifiable,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Final Interpretation for RI 137 - Rules governing binding sho uld be specifiable,
Carpenter, Diann
- RE: Final Interpretation for RI 137 - Rules governing binding sho uld be specifiable,
Apted, Tony J. [RA]
- RE: Final Interpretation for RI 137 - Rules governing binding sho uld be specifiable,
Pamela.Grannum
- RE: Final Interpretation for RI 137 - Rules governing binding sho uld be specifiable,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Final Interpretation for RI 137 - Rules governing binding sho uld be specifiable,
RJBotto
- Draft Interpretation for RI 178 - FAU confuses "audited" and "au ditable",
RJBotto
- Draft Interpretation for RI 177 - Meaning of "least upper bound" and "greatest lower bound",
RJBotto
- Closed Statement for RI 234 - The minimum number of each type of security attribute,
RJBotto
- Closed Statement for RI 248 - List Of Subjects And Objects Refers To Types Thereof,
RJBotto
- Final Interpretation for RI 137 - Rules governing binding should be specifiable,
RJBotto
- Draft Interpretation for RI 192 - Sequencing of sub-activities,
RJBotto
- Draft Interpretation for RI 220 - FCS_CKM/COP dependency on FDP_I TC.1,
RJBotto
- Closed Statement for RI 102 - User Attributes to be Bound Should be Specified,
RJBotto
- Interim Statement for RI 020 - SOF for cryptographic algorithms,
RJBotto
- Draft Interpretation for RI 175 - Circular Arguments in the objec tives of FUN.2,
RJBotto
- Closed Statement for RI 142 - Integrated Circuit Assurance,
RJBotto
- Closed Statement for RI 206 - Point of Clarification,
RJBotto
- Draft Interpretation for RI 180 - COV.3 dependency on FSP.1,
RJBotto
- Closed Statement for RI 154 - CC is more than evaluation,
RJBotto
- Draft Interpretation for RI 086 - Role of Sponsor,
RJBotto
- RE: Clarification of term in Assurance Continuity requirements do cument,
Apted, Tony J. [RA]
- FIPS Certification for Cryptographic Support,
Ken Doris
- Clarification of term in Assurance Continuity requirements document,
malnick
- Test Tool Specification,
Krall Ed-P27726
- Re: Test Tool Specification,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- RE: Test Tool Specification,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Test Tool Specification,
Krall Ed-P27726
- RE: Test Tool Specification,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- Re: Test Tool Specification,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- RE: Test Tool Specification,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- Re: Test Tool Specification,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- RE: Test Tool Specification,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: Test Tool Specification,
Stephen Brackin
- Re: Test Tool Specification,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- RE: Handling of a final interpretation,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- unique reference to the TOE,
Magosányi Árpád
- RE: I-0442: Restrictive Is Not Fully Defined Without Specificatio n Of Attributes,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- FIA_UID/FIA_UAU Hierarchy,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- PD-0099: FIA_UID.2, FIA_UAU.2, and FPT_STM.1 Requirements: On the IT Environment?,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- Re: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- RE: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Daniel P. Faigin
- RE: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- RE: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Arnold, James L. Jr.
- Re: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Fwd: Error Condition Re: RE: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Gary Stoneburner
- location for list archives,
Gary Stoneburner
- FW: tool for creating ST and PP?,
Akhilesh Dhawan
- RE: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
Apted, Tony J.
- RE: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
Daniel P. Faigin
- tool for creating ST and PP?,
Akhilesh Dhawan
- Re: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- Re: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- RE: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
Nir Naaman
- Re: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- RE: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
Nir Naaman
- Re: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- Re: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
Magosányi Árpád
- PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- Re: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Gary Stoneburner
- Re: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- Re: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Ken Elliott III
- RE: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Nir Naaman
- Re: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Ken Elliott III
- RE: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Nir Naaman
- Re: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- Re: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Ken Elliott III
- Re: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- Re: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Ken Elliott III
- Re: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Tom Benkart
- Re: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Ken Elliott III
- Re: PD-0091: Dependencies of Requirements on the IT Environment,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- Re: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- Re: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
Gary Stoneburner
- RE: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
Nir Naaman
- RE: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
Gary Stoneburner
- Re: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
Dr.Ir. D.J. Out
- RE: Do we need explicitly stated IT security requirement for FPT_ STM?,
Simpson, Randy
- CC Home Page,
YOKOTA HIROFUMI
- clarification needed: ALC_FLR.3.6C,
Magosányi Árpád
- Archive Question,
Eric J. Grimes
- New kid in the block,
Magosányi Árpád
- Re: I-0440: Clarification Of Detection/Prevention For FIA_UAU.3,
NIAP Interpretations Board
- Re: I-0451: When To Use IFF/IFC And ACF/ACC,
NIAP Interpretations Board