[Fwd: RE: Is JAMA thread-safe]
- Subject: [Fwd: RE: Is JAMA thread-safe]
- From: Ron Boisvert <boisvert@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:52:41 -0400
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
Sender: "Roldan Pozo" <roldanpozo@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Is JAMA thread-safe
"Thread safe" can have slightly different meanings, depending on context,
but if you mean "does Jama have state information that relies on globally
shared data," the answer is "no," so it should be thread-safe in this
regard. There is a call to Math.random() inside the Matrix class, and at
one point there was an issue with this in the Sun 1.4.2 release (see
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6362070) but I believe
this has been addressed in subsequent versions.
Hope this info helps,
Roldan
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Geri Wagner" <geri.wagner@swissrisk.com>
Reply-To: jama@nist.gov
To: Multiple recipients of list <jama@nist.gov>
Subject: Is JAMA thread-safe
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:27:08 -0400 (EDT)
Hi
I wonder whether the JAMA implementation is thread-safe.
I could not find a statetment on the website, but perhaps I have
overlooked it. Thank you for comments.
--
----------------------------------------
Dr. Geri Wagner
Quantitative Analyst
----------------------------------------
Swissrisk AG
Raeffelstr. 32, 8045 Zuerich Switzerland
t: +41 44 455 70 00
f: +41 44 455 70 01
m: +41 79 706 72 33
www.swissrisk.com
----------------------------------------
----- End forwarded message -----
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Problems or questions? Contact list-master@nist.gov