[Fwd: Confusion regarding the EigenDecomposition class]
- Subject: [Fwd: Confusion regarding the EigenDecomposition class]
- From: Ron Boisvert <boisvert@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:04:25 -0500
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
- User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Confusion regarding the EigenDecomposition class
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:33:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Greg Sterijevski <Greg.Sterijevski@InfiniumCM.com>
Reply-To: Greg.Sterijevski@InfiniumCM.com
To: boisvert@nist.gov
All,
I have been experimenting with the JAMA classes. I noticed something
which is puzzling to me. Please excuse my ignorance if the answer is
obvious.
I take the matrix presented below
{{4, -1, -1, -1}, {-1, 4, -1, -1}, {-1, -1, 4,-1},{-1,-1,-1,4}};
and run it throught the Eigendecomposition class.
It returns eigenvalues which are (.99999999, 4.9999999999, 5.0 , 5.0 ).
I also get the eigenvectors.
In the Eigendecomposition class, I force the class to take the path of
the nonSymmetric decomposition. I set issymmetric=false.
I still get the same eigenvalues, but the eigenvectors change radically.
Furthermore, it does not look like vectors are in the same direction. I
checked that there are no complex roots. Is this the expected result?
Furthermore, if I form the sandwich product of the original matrix with
its eigenvectors I do not get the eigenvalues on the diagonal.
Thanks for your help!
-Greg
Greg Sterijevski
PS I tried to look for a bug report/errata page but could not find it.
PPS This is the second time I am sending this message. It seems like
your servers are flagging this as spam.
PPS This is the 3^rd time I am sending this. Your spam blocker does not
like my Hotmail account.
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Problems or questions? Contact list-master@nist.gov