[Fwd: Rank using JAMA]
- Subject: [Fwd: Rank using JAMA]
- From: Ronald Boisvert <boisvert@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:15:48 -0400
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
- User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Rank using JAMA
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:23:39 -0400
From: siddharth singh <sid027@gmail.com>
Reply-To: sid027@gmail.com <sid027@gmail.com>
To: Boisvert, Ronald F. <ronald.boisvert@nist.gov>
Hi,
I'm doing a project on Tensegrity Designing and used JAMA package for
the matrix analysis part.I've come across certain problems.While
calculating rank MATLAB gives a different result for the same matrix and
JAMA does calculate rank but gives a very big value.It seems that it is
not sensetive to values in the matrix.If it is not then modification
needs to be done.If I'm wrong please tell me what should I do.
e.g including a value like 0.000001 in the matrix would result in an
erroneous result in JAMA.Please tell me the solution as soon as possible!
Regards,
Siddharth
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Problems or questions? Contact list-master@nist.gov