10 year old sendmail bug
- Subject: 10 year old sendmail bug
- From: Gary Stoneburner <gary.stoneburner@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:52:47 -0500
- Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_189481390==.ALT"
re:
http://www.computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/story/0,10801,79123,00.html
MARCH 10, 2003
"Has your sendmail been patched? Are you sure? If the answer is no,
stop reading this and get it taken care of. Not later today. Not later
this minute. You're already a week behind, and hackers have had exploit
code working since last Tuesday. There are no work-arounds. Your firewall
won't protect you. Your virus scanner won't protect you.
..."
"And since it took less than 48 hours for two separate groups of
hackers to come up with working attacks on this security hole after it
was officially announced, you can reasonably expect attacks to show up on
the Internet pretty quickly, too. "
"It's no simple buffer-overflow problem, like so many we've heard
about. In this case, the buffer that lets the bad guys in is
checked to make sure it doesn't overflow. Trouble is, there's a bug in
one of the checking routines. And if a bad guy exploits that coding error
-- but only if the bad guy knows exactly how to exploit
that specific coding error -- sendmail is vulnerable. Which explains why
it took 10 years for anyone to spot the problem, and why it was Internet
Security Systems in Atlanta that spotted it, not some malicious
adolescent in his bedroom. The problem was buried deep in code that has
been available to security experts and nasty crackers alike -- and until
now, no one spotted it. "
"... We're finding and fixing the flaws deep in the bedrock of our
IT infrastructure. And that makes us much safer. "
Wait a minute there sport! So you think that there are no bad guys
that knew about this bug last year or the year before or the year before
that? Do they already own your system? Do you
think that there are no other bugs that a bad guy knows about that we
don't?
Remember - those patches and work-arounds you have are there ONLY because
the guy who found the bug choose to tell us about it. How about the
possibility that there are guys in the business of finding bugs and not
telling?
Cheers,
Gary
**************************************************************************
* Opinions expressed are not intended to reflect an official
position
**************************************************************************
* Gary
Stoneburner
* Computer Security Division, National Institute of Standards &
Technology
* 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8930, Gaithersburg, MD
20877-8930
* Phone: 301-975-5394, FAX: 301-948-0279, Email: Stoneburner@nist.gov
**************************************************************************
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Problems or questions? Contact list-master@nist.gov